Nbible is not a science book

The bible is not a science book, yet it is scientifically accurate. Statements consistent with astronomy the bible says that each star is unique. The bible is a book of redemption, and of course i accept the creation story. Although christians accept the bible as entirely true, it does not use. Others look upon the bible as an ancient science book. Louie is the author of the comeback, the air i breathe, i am not but i know i am. It reveals god and gods plan for us and the whole universe. Yes, for although the bible is not a science textbook, it is accurate when it mentions matters of science. Youre right and as a christian myself if it isnt obvious by my username the bible is not a scientific book. For christians, gods word is the lens through which we see his world. Lets remember, too, that the bible is not a scientific textbook. Likewise, the way we see gods world through science can affect how we understand his word. The writers recorded what they received from god exactly as god wanted them to and as. Even if the bible had been intended to be a science.

God is both the author of creation and the author of scripture. Some people mishandle the word of truth by forcing it to be something god did not intend it to benamely, a science book. For many of us, the reality that the bible isnt a science book basically goes without saying. From babylon to america, the prophecy movie by school for prophets attila kakarott. The bible describes the precision of movement in the universe. An alert reader sent me a very short youtube video of francis collins, nih director, explaining the coexistence of science and evangelical. James kennedy correctly says about the bible, it is not a scientific textbook. The bible is not a science book, it isnt a history book either, then. But the bible is actually a textbook of historical scienceand the only such. Billy graham and creation science old earth creationism. Why the bible is not a science textbook faithlife blog. Consider some examples showing that science and the bible agree and that the bible contains scientific facts that differed greatly from the beliefs of many people living at the time it was written. The bible is not a scientific textbook, nor was it ever intended to be read in this way.

We have listed statements on this page that are consistent with known scientific facts. In fact, it was far ahe scientific accuracies of the bible. Now, im glad the bibles not a textbook of science like those used in public schools, because it would change all the time. But the bible is actually a textbook of historical scienceand the only such textbook that is totally reliable and infallible. The bible is not a science book, but it is scientifically correct. We are not aware of any scientific evidence that contradicts the bible. There is not place in the bible that disagree with true science, rather it enhances it. In this way, the bible is authoritative on things related to science and history and must be believed. I often have people tell me that the bibles not a science textbook. The qur aan is not a book of science but it is a book of signs dr zakir naik duration.

The bible is not a textbook of science why evolution is true. Those who insist on the bible being a reliable science book are actually making a mockery out of it and its original intent which was to tell the story of a remarkable teacher, known as the son of god, and to guide his followers in how to relate to god and one another. I dont think ive ever seen a book that leads kids from inspiring scientific facts into. The bible describes humankinds grand and sublime search. The bible describes the suspension of the earth in space. The bible is not a book about science, but when it does speak scientifically, it is accurate.